In the current issue of In These Times Karen J. Greenberg offers up eight reasons to close Guantánamo. The eight reasons are all hard to argue with but I know that there are those who will wish to do so. In the interests of time I will put myself in the position of the Bush administration and rebut them point by point.
- It is a legal no-man’s-land - "Exactly!"
- It violates the Geneva Conventions - "Isn't that quaint"
- Prisoners are degraded and abused - "And your point is?"
- Prisoners have no way to prove their innocence - "They are all evil doers"
- It undermines intelligence efforts - "So do we!"
- It creates new enemies - "Thereby creating new and profitable opportunities for our friends in the death trade - I mean defence industry."
- … and alienates our allies - "Only the Brits and Aussies are left anyway. Tony will be gone soon and Howard isn't looking too clever either"
- It will signal a fundamental change of strategy in the war on terror - "Hey. She spelled it t-e-r-r-o-r. Dick I told you it was spelled t-e-r-r-o-r not t-e-r-r-a!"
No comments:
Post a Comment