In describing the interrogation of suspects he says:
"the CIA used an alternative set of procedures.As The Decider (TM) he can say that these techniques are legal because, after all, he decides!
These procedures were designed to be safe, to comply with our laws, our Constitution and our treaty obligations. The Department of Justice reviewed the authorized methods extensively, and determined them to be lawful.
I cannot describe the specific methods used. I think you understand why. If I did, it would help the terrorists learn how to resist questioning and to keep information from us that we need to prevent new attacks on our country.
But I can say the procedures were tough and they were safe and lawful and necessary."
The proposals put forward for the tribunals are essentially a rehash of what the Supreme Court rejected allowing for the use of testimony acquired using coercive methods (aka torture), hearsay and prohibit a defendant's access to classified evidence. Their lawyers would also be prevented from seeing such evidence.
What he doesn't say is what happen to these prisoners if Congress does not acquiesce to his demands. Indefinite detention I suppose.
I can only imagine that this is just the first step in the generation of the climate of fear that Rove et al see as necessary for the Republicans to avoid serious defeat in November.
No comments:
Post a Comment