According to a news release from the Concerned Women for America (I'm sure I'd join if I could just be a woman!) tells us, and I quote, that "most nonhomosexual newspapers did not pursue the story".
I'm not sure what they are attempting to suggest; that if it hadn't been for the naughty boys at "the homosexual newspaper Washington Blade" that none of this would have come out.
From the same release we have "FOX-TV’s Bill O’Reilly of The O’Reilly Factor interviewed two homosexual activists Tuesday night, and tweaked them for going along with Foley’s evasions". Does this mean that there is film out there of O'Reilly tweaking homosexuals? Does he use a loofah? Oh happy day!
Meanwhile over at Alicublog, (who spends so much time reading what the wing nuts are up to that I worry) there's coverage of the curious reaction on the right side of the blogsphere to Mr. Foley's indiscretions. I'm surprised they haven't blamed Clinton yet. Or did they and I missed it?
I'm not sure what they are attempting to suggest; that if it hadn't been for the naughty boys at "the homosexual newspaper Washington Blade" that none of this would have come out.
From the same release we have "FOX-TV’s Bill O’Reilly of The O’Reilly Factor interviewed two homosexual activists Tuesday night, and tweaked them for going along with Foley’s evasions". Does this mean that there is film out there of O'Reilly tweaking homosexuals? Does he use a loofah? Oh happy day!
Meanwhile over at Alicublog, (who spends so much time reading what the wing nuts are up to that I worry) there's coverage of the curious reaction on the right side of the blogsphere to Mr. Foley's indiscretions. I'm surprised they haven't blamed Clinton yet. Or did they and I missed it?
7 comments:
h6iKao The best blog you have!
7Z02JX Nice Article.
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
Hello all!
Magnific!
Thanks to author.
Wonderful blog.
Post a Comment